Monday, February 7, 2011

Sailboat Cake Template

Supreme Court, the sixth public hearing criminal-Ti invited Eva Polak · Events Public

Comunicazione agli utenti del Blog da parte di Eva Polak
"Io ci sarò a Roma e cercherò di far rinviare l'udienza di Pistoia, ma ha detto l'avvocato che sarà difficile.
Avrei bisogno di persone che verrebbero a Roma per far vedere come NON funziona la giustizia quando la parte offesa è Eva Polak
Ciao."
Eva Polak all'udienza presso il giudice di pace non sarà presente, dovendo essere presente all'udienza presso cassazione sezione sesta alle ore 9.00-12. giovedì 10 febbraio 2011 Piazza Cavur ROMA.
Eva Polak,vi attende numerosi a partecipare all'udienza per i motivi sotto riportati dalla stessa Eva Polak.

Ora
Thursday, February 10 · 9:00 to 12:00 Place
Rome Piazza Cavour
Created by Eva Polak

More
are part of the criminal offense No RG 6737/09 Supreme Court (RG 1376/01 Attorney Pistoia), against a highly influential and powerful of Pistoia which has been met with the full formula of the crime of fraud by the Court of Appeal of Florence, even though I had swindled a large sum of money and I had produced all the tests imaginable, including false bank checks.
acts, the facts, the head of the ... mputazione were manipulated in both instances, so the only way to recover the cause, the complaint is false that I will present at the hearing, personally.
My lawyer does not want to come to Rome and says he does not know any lawyer who might replace him and I should get one myself. I do not know any lawyer in Rome and I do not think any lawyer I can contact my attorney instead of the delegate.
In October, the judges of the Supreme Court, I have already denied to exercise the right of action for fraud.
For this reason, I appeal to people who are in Rome and / or have occasion to attend the hearing, which is public, to participate personally in order to realize as I continue my rights are violated the law.

My lawsuit was in 2001, but until 2006 was not processed pending is ripe prescription required. When I removed the view of the limitation on appeal, the judges of the Court of Appeals judge and the first aid they have acquitted the accused on the grounds that at the time the checks were not protest, I have not suffered any financial loss and the defendant has gained nothing for the court viewed the checks as a means of guarantee and not as means of payment.
from this fraud and manipulated by this process originates from my trouble and this has resulted in the criminal trial for defamation against me because I did not want to succumb to the lies that I read in court documents.
the same day, the hearing also will be celebrated at my expense in Pistoia I started as an event, but which I can not participate because I have to go to Rome.

Probably, the magistrate of Pistoia, which must decide if such a day get hospitalized in OPG (forensic hospitals), I will not allow a postponement because the two processes overlap, even though by law I would have the right to participate to both.
So who was willing to participate in the event of February 10, 2011 in Pistoia, if they wanted to participate anyway, know that I will be in Rome.

I turn to the heart of a good lawyer, Supreme Court of Cassation in Rome, if he could be present at the hearing and to ensure that the Court would leave me at least to declare that I want to present a complaint of false ongoing hearing to attach to the minutes.
With the reservation that I do not have the opportunity to contribute because I have no income, so that I can not even afford a ticket to Rome and I have no idea how to get there. However, I have the legal aid that serves no purpose, as evidenced by the facts.

would be desirable that you attend to see how a parliamentary hearing is held where the part is called Eva Polak.
thank in advance those who will attend this event.

0 comments:

Post a Comment