Antonio Di Pietro (terzo da sinistra) a cena con il funzionario del Sisde Bruno Contrada (secondo da sinistra), in una delle foto scattate il 15 dicembre del 1992, nove giorni prima dell’arresto dello stesso (fonte Corriere.it) Antonio Di Pietro agente della Cia e amico di Bruno Contrada, il poliziotto poi accusato d’essere mafioso? Oh, ma siamo matti, avete deciso di rendermelo simpatico? Su quegli anni sono state raccontate tante di quelle fesserie, si sono pubblicate tante di quelle ricostruzioni mendaci, o direttamente deficienti, si sono accumulati talmente tanti detriti, che il passato non digeribile tornerà sempre a gola. L’abitudine italiana di mentire sulla propria storia, la speranza vile di superare il passato senza averlo chiarito, sono veleni a lenta cessione, che ammazzano a scoppio ritardato. Di Pietro è Di Pietro, basta e avanza.
Ora ha anche i nervi a fior di pelle, qualcosa lo disturba e lo rende inquieto. A una giornalista del TG1, che gli rivolgeva delle domande, s’è rivolto in modo ruspante: “fa domande del c… Non ce l’ho con lei ma con il suo amico Minzolini. Fuori ci sono i lavoratori dell’Alcoa che rischiano di perdere il posto e mi fate queste domande?”. Più tardi si è scusato, più che altro per il fraseggio non proprio accademico. Ma lo scatto aveva messo a nudo una certa idea della libertà di stampa, sulla quale potranno utilmente riflettere i suoi compagni di schieramento. Fuori, del resto, c’è tanta gente, e i giornalisti fanno le domande che vogliono. Si può sempre dire: non intendo rispondere. Ma Di Pietro non ci riesce, una volta, in tribunale, da imputato, pretendeva di parlare senza rispondere. Il presidente gli tolse la parola.
E’ nervoso, e forse ne ha motivo. Lo aspetta il congresso dell’Italia dei Valori, partito da lui fondato e posseduto, dove, però, è entrato anche chi pensa di poterlo sovrastare. Capita sempre così, c’è always someone more extreme than you. The surveys, then, once they were oracles only for the founder of another party, this was considered "plastic". Now they are bread and butter for many, and that Di Pietro is quite hard: the European elections in 2009, had brought home 8 percent of the vote, now positioned at the Sky 6.7, 6.6 and Ipsos to the Clandestine 6. Even to the media, things are not going well.
Among workers of Alcoa, moreover, there may even be interested to know if people actually working for the CIA, where s'attovagliava with service agents. There's so many fine people who wonders if the story he witnessed is not the case for other as if it is, so far, heard tell.
Operation Clean Hands was complex and not at all innocent. In the name of justice was violated the law. In the name of the state was destroyed politics. But those looking for the "mind", who wants to identify the "principal" did not understand anything. I will not summarize too much, because it's damn serious issue, I wrote in a book and I'm working here, to continue to talk about Peter and the recent uproar, enough to frame the general lines: the nineties began with the Cold War behind, the world opens; Italian capitalism is suffocating and nationalized, but think you could get rid of the cost of politics; the Italian market, however, is rich, with some precious jewels, which can be taken away by little, the political class is not the situation, does not understand and sinks. Clean Hands was the instrument dirt. Di Pietro its gross, but clever, interpreter.
They had a role, the Americans? And who the hell are the "American"? Even in the United States ended an era, with George Bush, former CIA director who loses the election, leaving room for a young man without much experience. When they joined the missiles was the U.S. government to want, rightly, and so we rightly placed. When you use the Confidential Information to hit the Italian, French, German, were non-state actors to take advantage. The first case was defending the West Soviet empire, in the second, pointing to the wealth of targets. Different stuff, and a little mica.
I read that Di Pietro would take a plate of Kroll investigative agency in the service business, given to him by an Italian agent who works for the Americans. I'm not sure she understood, but he deserved it. With Clean Hands Kroll could do a roaring trade, as was enough to build dossiers on hidden accounts (which all companies had to finance all the parties), sell them to interested parties and deliver them to a hungry attorney handcuffs. You know who gave the colonialists beads to the Indians in exchange for gold? They gave him a paperweight. Maybe even flattered him: go ahead, Buana.
In that same period he was preparing to care for our police, a report on the mingling of politics, business and organized crime. It was called "mafia contract." Cost the lives of Giovanni Falcone and Paolo Borsellino. The Mafia is protected, demonstrating its strength not only explosives, but also facilitating an attorney who shattered that relationship and, in the name of legality, it weakens and drowned. The State did not have similar strength, and he surrendered to magistrates in the name of the alleged legality put under your feet legitimacy.
Di Pietro was the face of rural and pastoral, it ungrammatical interpreter of the executioner squads. His profile is not ambiguous, but arcitaliano witnessing the genetic defects in our history: a degree in law without knowing Italian, enter into the judiciary with the recommendations, revelers with powerful people, it takes money and returns it in cash, accept gifts and favors, is working to fix her son and his wife to work (which is the second, as befits any good recommended by the priests). Has been done by himself, and it shows. He feels, as well. And 'the ever speck of rub with the powerful, of taking what we can, dell'inciuciarsi because you never know. When the investigation moved was sent to the front line as cannon fodder. Instead, newspapers and television stations the hail. It was the signal, we could proceed. He became famous.
What is known today was known even then. At one time you could not tell, today is useless. I see that some allow themselves to be groped: could not know. Stop: use DiPietro over di Pietro is how to transform it into a cultural paradigm. Also there is a limit to the indecency. The prosecutor then realized on the fly. The rules of communication had blood, and those around him (from the computer and to the left Colombo quirinalizio Borrelli) were too educated and thoughtful to be able to eat for a place so low. The crowd, being stirred up by fascists (these were) and Northern League, caressed by the Communists in search of complicity, was looking for a fellow. They found him. He made
courted by Berlusconi as Prodi. Guicciardini's Italy won again on that of Machiavelli (so, if Di Pietro me read this far, the confused ideas). Franza or Spain. And it is still there, because the past does not pass. Why has coagulated antistatism and desire to take advantage. Because there are still those who imitates him, and maybe think of getting his party trick. Because there are those who magnified: the moralistic (but goes beyond), the CIA agent (but do me the pleasure). Remember, he is just a symptom.
David Giacalone
0 comments:
Post a Comment